Why Even a Well-Designed AVR Can Sound Better: The Science Behind External Tweaks

“If the AVR is well engineered, nothing outside the box can improve it.” You’ll see this claim often. The reality is more nuanced: modern AVRs are very good, but they don’t live in isolation. They operate inside a larger electromagnetic ecosystem alongside routers, switching supplies, displays, set-top boxes, and a web of cables that act as antennas—both transmitting and receiving. External tweaks don’t replace good engineering; they complement it by reducing the noise burden the AVR must reject.

1) The Physics We Can’t Ignore

Noise reaches audio electronics through three primary coupling mechanisms:

  • Capacitive (electric-field) coupling — parallel conductors exchange energy through capacitance.
  • Inductive (magnetic-field) coupling — loops pick up changing magnetic fields.
  • Conducted coupling — noise rides the copper (common-mode on shields/mains; differential on signal conductors).

In PCB design, we also talk about crosstalk (including backward/near-end crosstalk). The same physics appear in audio: closely spaced conductors, shared grounds, and wide-band input stages allow high-frequency energy to sneak in and intermodulate down into the audible band.

2) The AVR as a Noise Node (Not a Closed Box)

An AVR integrates power conversion, DSP, DACs, analog preamp stages, and high-current output amplifiers. Each is robust on its own, but all share reference returns and chassis grounds. Every connected cable—HDMI, speaker, Ethernet, antenna—becomes a potential pathway for common-mode and differential-mode noise that can bypass parts of the AVR’s internal filtering.

3) Why Internal Design Doesn’t Eliminate All Noise

  • Switch-mode PSU limits: Great efficiency but susceptible to high-frequency common-mode noise at the input. Lowering upstream EMI helps the supply work in a cleaner regime.
  • Shared grounds: Digital video, DSP, DAC, and analog stages inevitably share ground references. Reducing common-mode currents reduces cross-pollination between sections.
  • Wide-band analog stages: Input buffers and op-amps often have MHz-class bandwidth. RF that sneaks in can create intermodulation products in the audible band.
  • Clocks and vibration: PSU noise and mechanical energy can modulate oscillator phase noise (jitter). Time-domain artifacts can be audible even if the 20 Hz–20 kHz FR plot looks flat.

4) Tools That Make a Measurable Difference

Cables engineered for noise rejection

  • Geometry: Twisted-pair or star-quad reduces loop area (inductive pickup); controlled spacing reduces capacitive coupling.
  • Shielding: Proper foil + braid combinations address different frequency ranges and improve common-mode rejection in unbalanced runs.
  • Targeted RF mitigation: Technologies like RNR (Germanium Noise Reduction) attenuate specific interference bands without loading the audio signal.

Power isolation and filtration

  • Isolation transformers (e.g., Torus): galvanic isolation, reduced common-mode noise, low source impedance for dynamic current delivery.
  • Star-grounding / single-outlet groups: minimize loop area between chassis grounds; simple and high-impact.

Mechanical isolation

  • Footers/platforms: decouple gear from floor-borne vibration (transformers and oscillators are microphonic).
  • Transformer damping: limits magnetostriction-related vibration and low-level hum modulation.


5) Real-World Example — Denon AVR-X3800H

Engineering snapshot

The AVR-X3800H is a 9.4-channel AVR rated at 105 W per channel (8 Ω, 2-ch driven) with 8K/60 and 4K/120 HDMI 2.1 support, immersive formats (Dolby Atmos, DTS:X, Auro-3D, IMAX Enhanced), HEOS streaming, and Audyssey MultEQ XT32 (Dirac Live optional). It’s a capable hub with dense digital and analog functionality in one chassis.

Measured perspective

Independent bench tests point to strong feature execution with good but not class-leading analog purity (SINAD/distortion), particularly versus some predecessors in pure analog mode. That doesn’t make it “bad”; it highlights that in a densely integrated AVR, small amounts of ingress or internal coupling can still influence low-level performance.

Where our tools come in

Challenge Mechanism Mitigation Tool Expected Result
Slightly elevated noise floor (analog) Mains-borne HF noise; common-/differential-mode Torus isolation transformer + Ricable power cable with RNR Lower HF on line conductors pre-entry; cleaner supply baseline
RF susceptibility in DAC/pre stages Radiated EMI via HDMI/Ethernet proximity Ricable interconnects with RNR + correct routing Reduced HF hash; smoother treble
Ground-related hum between sources Shared signal returns between subsystems Shielded, correctly grounded interconnects; star-grounding Lower hum; cleaner midrange
Internal domain crosstalk Digital ↔ analog proximity in one chassis MARC 7N speaker cables (low-C geometry) Better transient clarity; stable imaging
Mechanical resonance Transformer/board vibration → microphony IsoAcoustics Orea; transformer damping Sharper spatial focus; lower fatigue

Ricable Power Cable with RNR — Beyond the Box. The AVR-X3800H is Class II (lifted safety ground), so there’s no chassis-to-earth path. RNR doesn’t rely on that. It acts on the line conductors themselves, attenuating high-frequency interference before it reaches the inlet filter. This pre-entry reduction lightens the load on the AVR’s EMI network and improves system-wide AC hygiene on a shared branch circuit (display, subwoofer, sources), helping the receiver operate in a cleaner electromagnetic environment.

6. Frequency Response vs. Time Domain: Why ‘Same FR’ Doesn’t Mean ‘Same Sound’

Frequency response (FR) measurements are one of the most common ways to characterize an audio system. A typical FR chart shows the magnitude of a system’s output across the audible spectrum, often within a range like 20 Hz to 20 kHz. When plotted for different interconnects or speaker cables, these curves may appear identical, sometimes within ±0.01 dB — leading some to conclude that cables cannot affect sound.

However, this view overlooks the time-domain aspect of signal reproduction. Two systems can have identical magnitude FR plots yet differ significantly in phase response and transient behavior. These differences become visible in a square-wave test, where overshoot, ringing, and settling times reflect the combined effect of phase distortion and group delay — aspects not shown in a magnitude-only FR plot.

Illustration:

 

Frequency Response: Despite using different cables, both traces appear identical within ±0.01 dB across the audible range (20 Hz–20 kHz). Magnitude-only FR plots do not reveal phase, transient response, or noise floor differences — all of which can alter perceived sound quality.
10 kHz Square-Wave: Both systems measure flat in the frequency domain, yet the time-domain reveals overshoot, ringing, and settling time differences. These variations in transient behavior — often linked to phase response and impedance interactions — are inaudible in a simple FR plot but can change the clarity and spatial cues in real music.

 

Rebuttal: Why “Same Frequency Response” ≠ “Same Sound”

  1. Yes — FR can be derived from the impulse response. From a signal-processing perspective, the Fourier transform of an impulse response yields both magnitude and phase vs. frequency. This is true in the context of an ideal, linear, time-invariant (LTI) system.
  2. But — real systems aren’t just cables in isolation. A cable is part of a complete RLC network with the source output stage and load input stage. The effective transfer function changes with impedance matching, reactive coupling, and EMI conditions.
  3. FR plots usually ignore phase. Standard FR graphs only show amplitude, not phase. Two systems can have identical amplitude curves but different group delays, altering how transients and complex waveforms are reproduced.
  4. Noise isn’t part of the FR chart. Cable shielding and noise-reduction technologies like Ricable’s RNR may not alter a swept-sine FR trace, but they can lower the broadband noise floor, unmasking low-level details in music that are hidden during normal listening.
  5. Impulse response tests in practice aren’t ideal. In real-world measurements, impulse generation, room reflections, and noise floor limitations can obscure subtle differences, even when they are present in actual playback.

Bottom line: The claim “frequency response remains the same regardless of the cable” holds only in the narrow sense of idealized, magnitude-only measurements. In practice, cables can influence phase response, transient performance, and noise immunity — all of which affect how we perceive sound, even if the FR chart looks identical.

7) Practical Setup Checklist

  • Power: group AVR + sources on the same outlet; add isolation where feasible.
  • Cabling: cross power and signal at right angles; avoid long parallel runs; use shielded interconnects.
  • Grounding: break ground loops first (e.g., CATV isolator, star-ground) before swapping hardware.
  • Mechanics: isolate the most vibration-sensitive gear (DAC/streamer) and the noisiest (transformers, drives).

8) Takeaway

External tweaks don’t “fix” a modern AVR’s design—they reduce the noise burden around it. Treat the system as a whole—power, grounding, cabling, mechanics—and you let the AVR perform closer to its engineered potential.

Further Reading & Real-World Demos

Back to blog